Tool Kit: A Trove of Tablets for Young Hands

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Children take their tablets, a term defined loosely, as seriously as they do their bikes. So if you are going to buy one that is for them — not you — you had better involve them in the process. They understand that this single device is a million-channel TV, music collection, game machine, camera and e-book library, and a way to socialize with friends. They may not understand — but you will — that in addition to the first $200 or so you lay out for a tablet, you will be paying for music, books, movies and apps far into the future.

So, what to get? The 21 tablets I reviewed for this article each have strengths and weaknesses. Here’s a crash course.

ANDROID TABLETS Android-based tablets for children are the newest versions on the block. Each is on a mission to distract children from the iPad and other mainstream tablets, and choices abound. For about $150, you can get the Kurio 7, MEEP or Tabeo.

The Nabi 2 costs a bit more ($200) but has a noticeably better screen. The Nabi Jr. ($100) is smaller and can double as a baby monitor. Though tricky to turn on, these tablets have colorful silicon bumpers for child-proofing. They also are slower, which I discovered when loading the same app on each one. This is a great test. Angry Birds starts in 10 seconds on the iPad Mini, vs. 33 seconds on the Tabeo.

Look at how much storage the devices have. It can be limited to just four gigabytes. This is important because apps and movies take space. One full-length HD video — about two gigabytes — can use half the storage space on the Tabeo, which means you’ll need to invest more in a micro-SD card.

The best overall option was the four-inch, $150 MG. Pocket-size and powerful — it loaded Angry Birds in 15 seconds — the MG is built around the Google Play app store. The MG comes with a preapproved digital allowance system, so children can do their own shopping. You supply the USB cable and Wi-Fi.

Beware that some of these devices — the Tabeo, MEEP and Kurio — are intended to sell you apps, music, e-books and movies purchased in their special stores. By the time you add in a micro-SD card to increase memory, you may be better off investing in the MG with easy access to mainstream app stores, or the Nexus 7 or Kindle Fire HD.

MAINSTREAM TABLETS My young testers, ages 3 to 12, kept reaching for the iPad first for good reason. They could find the apps they wanted, and the entire experience was familiar. But who wants to pay $300 for the iPod Touch 5, $329 for an iPad Mini or $400 for the lowest-priced iPad 2?

The good news is that the Android options are improving, in terms of app selection and overall quality. Android tablets cost far less, too.

Both the Kindle Fire HD, from Amazon, and Google’s Nexus 7 offer power, apps and parental control features at a price near those for children’s tablets.

The testers were also attracted by the detachable keyboard on the Microsoft Surface ($500 plus $100 for the keyboard). They saw it as a replacement for a laptop they use for homework. But the best non-Apple option I could find was the Kindle Fire HD, a choice made easier thanks to Kindle FreeTime Unlimited, a fixed-price subscription-based service ($5 per child) that lets children shop on their own for books, apps, games and movies, without surprise bills.

If price is your sole determining factor, consider turning your iPhone 3s, 4 or 4s into an iPod Touch. With an Internet connection but no cellphone service, they serve as great mini iPad Minis. If you have a dead iPod Touch 4, you can get new batteries for $80 from Apple. Make sure to fully explore the built-in parental controls on both Apple and Android operating systems.

TOY OPTIONS These educational game tablets provide the lowest point of entry, at least in terms of initial cost. VTech’s MobiGo 2 ($50) and the LeapsterGS ($70) are both solid options, considering they come with a suite of onboard activities. VTech’s InnoTab 2 ($80) and Leapfrog’s LeapPad 2 (about $100) take a step closer to the tablet format. You might take this option if (a) your child has never used a multitouch screen, which they will prefer once they’ve used one; (b) you’re just not ready to part with $150 to $200; or (c) you want to ensure your child stays offline.

Downloading new content is difficult, and plug-in game cartridges cost $20 to $25. Once you consider the initial purchase, plus four AA batteries, plus games, you’ve already spent enough more than the cost of a mainstream Android tablet, with a limitless supply of apps.

VIDEO GAME CONSOLES Major contenders this holiday include the clunky, expensive PlayStation Vita ($250) and three better designed options from the company that pioneered the hand-held computing category — Nintendo. These include the Nintendo DSi ($100), the Nintendo 3DS ($170) and its new big-screen edition, the Nintendo 3DS XL ($200). Most software cartridges for those are games like Mario Tennis Open. But look at it another way: there is content you’ll never find in iTunes or Google Play, like highly coveted Pokémon White Version 2 ($35). You can find more educational titles like brain teasers and Art Academy, where your child can learn to draw in step-by-step tutorials.

If you happen to share a home with two or more children, it’s hard to beat the Nintendo DS local play feature, where multiple players can share the same game, as long as they’re in the same room. Based on price, power and app availability, the Nintendo options make more sense, and the DS clamshell design negates the need for a protective silicone bumper.

Explore the robust parental controls that are built into the Nintendo DS system. This includes the ability to lock the 3-D options behind a PIN, as well as the ability to control purchases. You will find Angry Birds but not Cut the Rope, and you generally cannot use the DS players to get access to the Web, but you can download arcade classics like Donkey King Jr. for $4. There’s a modified version of Hulu for TV viewing, provided there is Wi-Fi access.

When it comes to children’s tablets, hardware is only as good as the software it can run. Your child wants the same thing in a tablet that you do — easy use and access to lots of apps so it always contains a fresh experience. All things considered, the iPad or iPad Mini is still the best children’s tablet, but Android options are closing the gap.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: December 15, 2012

An article on the Personal Tech pages on Thursday about tablet computers for children included outdated information on the availability of Angry Birds on the Nintendo DS and 3DS XL. The game was released for those Nintendo devices on Sept. 25; it is not the case that it is still not available.

View the original article here

Microsoft will cripple Chrome and Firefox on Windows 8 arm tablets. Who cares?

 

Microsoft will cripple Chrome and Firefox on Windows 8 arm tablets. Who cares?

When arm tablets running Windows 8 ship, Chrome, Firefox, and other browsers will be at a disadvantage, because Internet Explorer is the only browser allowed to take advantage of some features of the operating system. Mozilla and Google are crying "foul". These restrictions really cares?

To understand the controversy, you need a little bit of background on how Windows 8 on arm tablets. (Windows 8 on arm tablets, once called WOA, is now formally called Windows RT.)
RT of Windows, such as Windows 8 will include an interface and a desktop interface and some call it the desktop interface "Windows Classic". It is likely that most people won't run the desktop interface that often, because the metre is much better suited for touchscreen tablets.
The Metro is a much more limited than Windows Classic, and a variety of technologies and add-ins will not run into it. This is true in the traditional version of Windows 8, as well as the compressed version of Windows 8, Windows RT. In the traditional version of Windows 8, however, any browser will be able to run in the desktop, taking advantage of certain features.
Windows RT, though, just a browser will be allowed on the Windows Classic desktop-Internet Explorer. Chrome, Firefox and other browsers will be banned. And this is what Mozilla and Google has weapons. (Or is that?)
Project Manager, responsible for Mozilla Asa Dotzler from Firefox development for Windows 8, said in a blog post that this gives Microsoft an unfair advantage:

"Windows on arm prohibits any browser except Internet Explorer running in privileged environment" Windows Classic ". In practice, this means that only Internet Explorer will be able to perform many of the functions vital for the advanced computer modern browsers in terms of speed, stability and security that users have become accustomed. Given that IE can run in Windows on arm, there is no technical reason to conclude that other browsers can't do the same.
Why this is important for users? Simply because Windows on arm-designed as currently restricts the user's choice, reduces competition and innovation of chills. Allowing only IE perform advanced functions of a Web browser, third-party browsers are effectively excluded from the platform ".

Google agrees with Dotzler, telling CNet:

"We share the concerns that Mozilla has raised regarding Windows 8 limiting innovation and user choice. We have always welcomed the innovation in the browser space on all platforms and I firmly believe that all of us have great competitors do work harder. In the end, consumers and developers to benefit the most from tough competition. "

Microsoft claims that it needs to restrict access to desktop for reasons of security and performance, and this is why only certain applications gain access to it, specifically IE and Microsoft Office.
Do not buy Microsoft's reasoning fully--after all, Windows 8 on PC, other applications are allowed to run on the desktop. It may be true that RT Windows hardware will be more susceptible to performance slowdowns that traditional Windows hardware because hardware RT will generally have slower processors and less RAM. That may not always be the case, however, because Windows 8 will run on netbooks, which typically have low-end hardware.
However, I don't think that banning Chrome, Firefox and other browsers from the desktop RT will make difference in browser market share. There is not much more than a chance that Windows 8 tablet will make significant progress against iPads and Android tablets. And people who use Windows tablets, only a very small percentage would likely change their default browser, even if they had a choice. So in terms of market share, not allowing Firefox and Chrome on your desktop will be barely registered as a blip.
Regarding the user's choice, certainly it would be better if buyers of Windows 8 tablet has had more of a realistic option in the browser. But limiting the choice of browser is likely Microsoft hurt more than help it.