Shares of AAPL take a dive after earnings Records

Release suite of Apple last night - where the most profitable fourth quarter have been published in the history of the world - Apple shares took a dive, falling more than 10% to the range of $460.

Addressing the absurdity of Wall Street, some were disappointed that Apple has not quite hit a consensus of estimates of revenue and sales of the iPhone, even though the overall profits of Apple corresponded to what analysts were expecting. As a result, Apple shares now traded almost 52-week low.

So, what gives? Why is one of the most profitable companies on the planet taking a beating in the stock market? Well, much of this has to do with tips from Apple for the next quarter.

Historically, Apple has issued guidelines very conservative he was able to beat it hands down. Soon, the analysts spread to small set of Apple and started ignoring directives from Apple altogether. This often resulted in estimates of profits for Apple, which were large enough, and while Apple has been able to follow for some time, growth can be indeed slowing down.

Anyway, financial director Apple Peter Oppenhiemer pointed out yesterday that Apple would no longer conservative issue, but would be issuing a realistic range with regard to its future earnings.

In recent years, our guidance reflects a point estimate of conservative or results every quarter we have reasonable confidence in the achievement. Further, we intend to offer a range of guidelines that reflect our faith in what we are likely to get.

In the future, Apple is anticipated revenues for the next quarter to fall in the range of $41 to 43 billion. That is significantly less than the sum of 45 billion $ estimate on Wall Street, people were expecting. And since Apple is civilian is no longer their orientation, there is now less a hypothesis that Apple will blow beyond the estimates of each and provide earnings Records. For what it's worth, income from Apple during the quarter January-March 2012 was 39.2 billion $.

The takeaway from all this, it is that many think that the growth of Apple slows permanently, and as a result, the stock is to take a dive.

After Deportation, John McAfee Returns to U.S.

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
A commercial jet carrying Mr. McAfee landed in Miami shortly before 7 p.m. Wednesday, said Greg Chin, a spokesman for Miami International Airport.

A short time later, a posting on McAfee’s Web site announced that he was at a hotel in Miami’s South Beach neighborhood. Mr. McAfee has frequently communicated through the Web site.

“I have no phone, no money, no contact information,” the post says. Reached by telephone at the hotel, Mr. McAfee said that he could not talk because he was waiting for a call from his girlfriend.

Other passengers on the flight said that Mr. McAfee, 67, was escorted off the aircraft before everyone else.

Maria Claridge, a 36-year-old photographer from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., said, “He walked very peacefully, chin up. He didn’t seem stressed.”

She said he was well dressed, in a black suit and white shirt, and appeared to be traveling alone.

An F.B.I. spokesman in Miami, James Marshall, said in an e-mail that the agency was not involved with Mr. McAfee’s return to the United States. Authorities from Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Marshals office and the United States attorney’s office did not immediately respond to questions about whether Mr. McAfee would be questioned or detained. They said there was no active arrest warrant for Mr. McAfee that would justify taking him into custody.His expulsion from Guatemala marked the last chapter in a strange, monthlong odyssey to avoid police questioning about the November killing of American expatriate Gregory Viant Faull, who lived a couple of houses down from McAfee’s compound on Ambergris Caye, off Belize’s Caribbean coast.

View the original article here

Social Media Strategy Crucial for Transit Agencies After Storm

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
“I have asked nicely several times about what’s going on with the 317 bus,” the rider, who identified herself as Mary Scandell, fumed on the Facebook page of New Jersey Transit a few days after Hurricane Sandy. “Now I’m gonna ask in a nasty way.”

Change the scene to New York. A commuter named Jim Temple posted a question on the Long Island Rail Road’s Facebook page, asking for a status update of the damaged Long Beach line. The railroad promptly replied. “Thank you for the info,” Mr. Temple answered.

If there is one lesson transit officials have learned from Hurricane Sandy, it is that in the Internet era, keeping riders up to date is just as important as tracks and rolling stock. Blow it, and they will let you know. As workers raced to bring washed-out tracks, flooded tunnels and swamped electrical equipment back online, they also faced the daunting task of keeping millions of riders informed of conditions and schedules that sometimes shifted by the minute, using tools that included Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and YouTube.

A look at how New Jersey Transit and the Long Island Rail Road communicated, as viewed through the prism of Facebook, showed how approaches to messaging could make the difference between shaping expectations or fueling the ire of customers forced to find new ways to get to work and home.

The Long Island Rail Road continually updated its Facebook page with photographs and videos of storm preparations before Hurricane Sandy hit. The dispatches continued as high winds and surge waters ripped down power lines and clogged rail lines with wayward boats and other debris. The agency frequently answered passengers’ questions and posted other helpful updates, like where to seek federal assistance for damaged homes.

New Jersey Transit also regularly updated its page — but did not start posting photographs until after noon on Oct. 30, after the storm had barreled through. It answered riders’ questions sporadically, sometimes referring them to incorrect information on its Web site, even as commuters grew more confused trying to figure out shifting schedules.

The result: the Long Island Rail Road conveyed a narrative of shared pain, of workers fighting back against unprecedented damage that was beyond their control. Passengers frequently and vociferously critical of the railroad suddenly sympathized and even praised communication efforts that, if not perfect, were viewed as improved.

New Jersey Transit’s communications, on the other hand, became for many commuters yet another source of misery.

“Long Island Rail Road learned the lesson of telling their riders what’s going on,” said Mitchell Moss, director of the Rudin Center for Transportation at the New York University Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. “And it turns out that is as important as the level of service you are providing.”

The Long Island Rail Road and New Jersey Transit also used Twitter extensively. But The New York Times examined the Facebook pages of each agency because they allow for more detailed comments — providing a deeper look at how passengers were viewing communications — and more of a back-and-forth discussion. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which was also criticized for its communications, used Twitter but does not have a Facebook page.

New Jersey Transit has come under scrutiny after the storm damaged more than 300 train cars and locomotives parked in rail yards in Hoboken and the Meadowlands that prestorm warnings indicated would flood.

But even before that decision became widely known, passenger tensions were spiking.

New Jersey Transit officials defended their communications throughout and after the storm.

“We were tweeting information practically 24 hours a day,” said John Durso Jr., the agency’s spokesman. He said the agency also continually updated its Web site; sent out e-mail alerts; placed advertisements in newspapers on emergency shuttle, bus and ferry service; and made frequent appearances on television and radio broadcasts.

View the original article here

Twitter, Facebook Direct Anger At NRA After School Shooting

After a tragedy such as the shooting deaths of a reported 27 (including the gunman) at Sandy Hook Elementary on Friday morning, there's always a debate: How much time must pass before one can weigh in on the politics on gun control?

Of course, some on Facebook and Twitter have chosen not to wait. And they're directing their anger at the most well-known gun advocacy group in the country: the National Rifle Association.

The organization's official Twitter account, @NRA, has become the target of Twitter's collective ire on Friday after the Newtown shootings. Take a look at what people are saying.

Read more below.

Loading Slideshow

Of course, that's only a sampling. The anger is evident on Facebook, too, as the Daily Dot notes. There, the website reported, anti-gun Facebook users latched onto an NRA post giving a free "auto emergency tool." Users argued that the attacks wouldn't have happened with stricter gun control laws that the NRA has advocated against, per the Dot.

At the time of writing, the NRA's Facebook page appears to be down. As for its Twitter account, which usually updates three to four times a day, it's been silent since 9:39 a.m., about the time the shootings began.

View the original article here

The progress of Alzheimer's slower after 80: study

By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Aug. 2 HealthDay News)--the Deadly March Alzheimer is less in people age 80 or older than younger elderly, scientists have found.

The risk of developing Alzheimer's increases with age, and by 85, the risk is about 50 percent. But those who develop progressive brain disorder that at the end of life will be less aggressive than the disease whose symptoms appear in the 1960s and 1970s, according to researchers at the University of California, San Diego.

Lead researcher Dominic Holland from the University Department of neurosciences, said that doctors will need to consider these findings, assessing the elderly patients with Alzheimer 's.

"Methods of early detection, which will be based on biomarkers, as well as mental capacity, you should consider the age of the persons assessed," he said. Because the "old" elderly could deteriorate in a slightly slower rate than younger patients, doctors may not realize that these people suffering from Alzheimer 's.

The findings also have relevance for the assessment of potential Alzheimer's treatment and prognosis for patients of different Alzheimer's care costs, clinical Holland and other experts say.

There is currently no effective treatment or the treatment of Alzheimer 's, which gradually destroys the cells of the brain and robs people of memory and their ability to perform everyday tasks and communication.

The report was published online in the journal PLoS Aug. 2 one.

Study progress of Alzheimer, Holland and colleagues used data from the research initiative of the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging. They looked at more than 700 people aged 65 to 90, some with normal mental functioning, some mild symptoms of dementia and other persons suffering from Alzheimer 's.

Participants are tested every 6 or 12 months.

The researchers found that Alzheimer's patients lost mental skills to younger more quickly than older patients.

The decline among patients younger paralleled the accelerated loss of brain tissue and increase bone marrow or knob fluid Alzheimer's seen among the younger age group, compared with older patients, study authors added.

Researchers are not sure why Alzheimer's is more aggressive in younger patients. One explanation may be that older patients are decreasing trend in this slower pace for a longer period of time, in some unknown factor keeping symptoms at bay, they suggest.

Another possibility is the older patients with dementia Alzheimer 's, which can place plus the full effect of Alzheimer's in the brain. But such a diagnosis must be made with the Visual inspection, which is the only way that Alzheimer's is diagnosed, Holland noted carefully.

Alzheimer's disease currently affects an estimated 5.6 million Americans, and this number is expected to triple by 2050 as the baby boom generation ages.

Finding that previous develops the disease more aggressive is not good news for those younger older patients who suffer losses for a long time, the deterioration of their mental capacities, Holland said.

Another expert said that the findings may have implications for predicting costs of health and clinical trials.

"This is an extremely important paper about the impact on both the forecast costs of care for Alzheimer's and planning clinical trials," said Dr. Sam Gandy, Associate Director of the Mount Sinai Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City.

If the clinical picture in the over-85 population is milder than what is typical in populations Younger, these older patients would remain independent already and projections for the economic burden to the health care system should be adjusted, he said.

"Annual cost of 200 billion dollars in the United States now is; the projection of $ 1 trillion annually by 2050, "Gandy says.

"Maybe that $ 1 trillion is really only $ 500 to 750 billion dollars. Still catastrophic, but it is worth taking this into account, "he added in the projection.

Equally important, if the speed of the decline is less than 85 years of age at the age of 65-years, which must be taken into account during the recruitment for clinical trials, Gandy said.

For example, if all of the patients receiving the drug were more than 85 and all patients receiving inactive placebo were significantly younger, it might appear that the drug worked, when in fact the population were incorrectly matched, Gandy pointed out.

"We must know that we wanted the population to be identical as possible, but really do not know the specific of this phenomenon before," he said.

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved. SOURCE: Dominic Holland, Ph.d., researcher, Department of neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine; Sam Gandy, M.D., Ph.d., Mount Sinai Research Chair and Professor of Neurology and Psychiatry Alzheimer's and the CEO, the Mount Sinai Center for cognitive health and Associate Director, Mount Sinai Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City; Aug. 2, 2012, PLoS One, the online

View the original article here

After fighting for his life, holds mom finally newborn

Tommy Scott was not worried when his pregnant wife called to tell him she thought she was on the road with a migraine. But when he came home from work, Tommy found amber, 38 weeks pregnant, laying in their bedroom do not react with one eye open and the other closed, Moaning and vomiting.

"Rush of course everything through your head," Tommy told today's Natalie Morales. "I phoned 911 right away and the ambulance was there within 10 minutes and we were at the hospital right away. But it was crazy. "

Doctors determined that the 29-year-old Amber had a ruptured blood vessel in his brain — a condition that occurs in approximately six out of every 100,000 pregnancies.

Surgeons elected to deliver her baby by C-section, and then to operate on Amber's brain.

Initially, everything seemed fine as Amber started to come out of the anesthesia.  But then things took a frightening turn and she was once again responding. Realizing that the Ambers brain had started to swell rapidly, doctors removed part of her skull to protect her brain from being crushed against the bone.

A month later, Amber woke up, but was not well enough to talk himself. All the while watching her family visited regularly, showing Amber photos of baby, Adeline, she had yet to hold or even.

"We wanted to let her know the baby was okay," Tommy told today.  "Since day one we have shows her images."She started to smile a little.  She always smiles now. "

On Sunday, for the first time got Amber to keep her baby and begin to care for her.

"She kept the bottle and fed her," Tommy told today.  "She needs a little assistance, but the most important part, she grabbed the bottle and went right into the mouth. She knows what is going on. For the first time, smiled Adeline also. "

Amber is still got a long way to go. Doctors predict she will be in intensive rehab for weeks working to regain speech and motor skills.

But they say are positive signs.

"She now communicates with us," said Dr. Andrea Toomer, a doctor at West Jefferson Medical Center, just outside New Orleans, today. "She can tell us what she needs and what she wants, what Bothers her. She is able to ask questions about what is going on. "

It is enough for a start to Amber's mom.

"The fact that she witness Adeline now that she recognizes her, that makes me feel better," said Laura Rabalais today.

For Tommy, who had been looking forward to the day when he and his wife would be parents, it has been "bittersweet."

"Of course you satisfied," he told Morales. "I am happy that I am a father now. But of course I will be with yellow all the time, too.

"Amber was so excited for the last nine months. Her whole life, everything revolved around making sure everything was prepared for Adeline. It is so sad. But we try to include Amber in everything we can. We always tell her daily activities. We do our best to keep her informed. "

Tommy takes hope from the speed of Ambers progress so far.

"I never would have thought that we would be this much sooner, compared to where we were we first started," he told today. "She has motivation to get better, and I believe she will definitively".

More health today:
Aimee Copeland in ' high spirits ' in rehab
Fantastic MRI video shows birth from the inside
Dangerous ride? ATV deaths Prompt safety warning

View the original article here

Intimidation Tactics? Prof demoted after criticizing university for PSA seminar

About 20 months ago, Dr. Michael Wilkes of UC-Davis and a colleague wrote an editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle, “PSA tests can cause more harm than good.”  He questioned his institution’s public event for men focusing on prostate cancer screening.  Excerpts of the editorial:

“Sadly, most men are never told the facts about the test, nor are they encouraged to make their own informed decision. The UC Davis course doesn’t even acknowledge a problem with prostate cancer screening. Its expert presenters – including two urologists and a professional football player (!) – will tell you that you need to “know your (PSA) statistics” beginning at age 40. …

We can’t say why UC Davis offers this course that ignore scientific evidence, but we wonder whether it just might have to do with money. Testing for and treating PSA-identified cancer is a large part of the practice of many urologists so it may not be surprising that urology groups take a far more positive stance on the test than almost any other doctors. They also fund a pro-PSA lobby that now includes the National Football League.

Health care spending is threatening to wreak greater and greater havoc on our economy. That’s not to say we shouldn’t invest in treatments that lead to improved health, even when they’re expensive.

And UC Davis, the NFL and surgical device companies have the right in our society to promote events in order to increase their profits. But we worry when companies and doctors with a conflict of interest sponsor what could be considered an infomercial endorsement to unsuspecting men without telling them they might end up being harmed as a result of a simple PSA blood test.”

Last week, InsideHigherEd.com reported that hours after that editorial was published, UC Davis administrators kicked off a series of steps to remove Wilkes from leadership positions he had held.  Excerpt:

Now, a committee on academic freedom at the university that investigated allegations of intimidation and harassment against Wilkes has found them to be true. The faculty committee said in its report, a copy of which was obtained by Inside Higher Ed, that the actions of the university administrators cast doubt on its ability to be a “truthful and accountable purveyor of knowledge and services.”

The group has asked the dean and other top officials at the university’s school of medicine to write letters of apology to the professor, admit to errors of judgment, stop proposed disciplinary actions against him and take steps to prevent future violations of academic freedom.

At the end of last week, the UC Davis Academic Senate Representative Assembly voted 52-0 to:

affirms the right of academic freedom of Professor Michael Wilkes and all other faculty to publish scholarly articles and professional expert commentaries that address ethics and societally relevant critiques.call upon the Dean, Executive Associate Dean, and the Health System Counsel of the School of Medicine of the University of California, Davis, all to:

1. Accept promptly and publicly responsibility for serious errors in judgment;
2. Write individual letters of apology to Professor Wilkes;
3. Rescind in writing all disciplinary actions that have been stated, proposed, or taken
against Professor Wilkes.

Also:

Resolved, That the Representative Assembly of the Davis Division of the Academic Senate expresses severe disapproval of the notion that the University of California may take legal action against professors whose scholarly publications or professional expert commentaries may be perceived by University administrators to be injurious to University interests.Resolved, That the Representative Assembly of the Davis Division of the Academic Senate calls upon the Chancellor of the University of California, Davis, within six months to:

1. Take concrete steps to prevent future violations of rights of academic freedom and
report to the Davis Division the steps that have been taken to this end.
2. Have the Dean of the School of Medicine take appropriate training to prevent
academic freedom violations.

Finally, in a 50-0 vote, the Assembly added a resolution:

That the Representative Assembly condemns Health System and Campus Legal Counsels for drafting inappropriate and apparently threatening letters that violated a faculty member’s right to academic freedom.

View the original article here

Intimidation Tactics? Prof demoted after criticizing university for PSA seminar

About 20 months ago, Dr. Michael Wilkes of UC-Davis and a colleague wrote an editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle, “PSA tests can cause more harm than good.”  He questioned his institution’s public event for men focusing on prostate cancer screening.  Excerpts of the editorial:

“Sadly, most men are never told the facts about the test, nor are they encouraged to make their own informed decision. The UC Davis course doesn’t even acknowledge a problem with prostate cancer screening. Its expert presenters – including two urologists and a professional football player (!) – will tell you that you need to “know your (PSA) statistics” beginning at age 40. …

We can’t say why UC Davis offers this course that ignore scientific evidence, but we wonder whether it just might have to do with money. Testing for and treating PSA-identified cancer is a large part of the practice of many urologists so it may not be surprising that urology groups take a far more positive stance on the test than almost any other doctors. They also fund a pro-PSA lobby that now includes the National Football League.

Health care spending is threatening to wreak greater and greater havoc on our economy. That’s not to say we shouldn’t invest in treatments that lead to improved health, even when they’re expensive.

And UC Davis, the NFL and surgical device companies have the right in our society to promote events in order to increase their profits. But we worry when companies and doctors with a conflict of interest sponsor what could be considered an infomercial endorsement to unsuspecting men without telling them they might end up being harmed as a result of a simple PSA blood test.”

Last week, InsideHigherEd.com reported that hours after that editorial was published, UC Davis administrators kicked off a series of steps to remove Wilkes from leadership positions he had held.  Excerpt:

Now, a committee on academic freedom at the university that investigated allegations of intimidation and harassment against Wilkes has found them to be true. The faculty committee said in its report, a copy of which was obtained by Inside Higher Ed, that the actions of the university administrators cast doubt on its ability to be a “truthful and accountable purveyor of knowledge and services.”

The group has asked the dean and other top officials at the university’s school of medicine to write letters of apology to the professor, admit to errors of judgment, stop proposed disciplinary actions against him and take steps to prevent future violations of academic freedom.

At the end of last week, the UC Davis Academic Senate Representative Assembly voted 52-0 to:

affirms the right of academic freedom of Professor Michael Wilkes and all other faculty to publish scholarly articles and professional expert commentaries that address ethics and societally relevant critiques.call upon the Dean, Executive Associate Dean, and the Health System Counsel of the School of Medicine of the University of California, Davis, all to:

1. Accept promptly and publicly responsibility for serious errors in judgment;
2. Write individual letters of apology to Professor Wilkes;
3. Rescind in writing all disciplinary actions that have been stated, proposed, or taken
against Professor Wilkes.

Also:

Resolved, That the Representative Assembly of the Davis Division of the Academic Senate expresses severe disapproval of the notion that the University of California may take legal action against professors whose scholarly publications or professional expert commentaries may be perceived by University administrators to be injurious to University interests.Resolved, That the Representative Assembly of the Davis Division of the Academic Senate calls upon the Chancellor of the University of California, Davis, within six months to:

1. Take concrete steps to prevent future violations of rights of academic freedom and
report to the Davis Division the steps that have been taken to this end.
2. Have the Dean of the School of Medicine take appropriate training to prevent
academic freedom violations.

Finally, in a 50-0 vote, the Assembly added a resolution:

That the Representative Assembly condemns Health System and Campus Legal Counsels for drafting inappropriate and apparently threatening letters that violated a faculty member’s right to academic freedom.

View the original article here

After fighting for his life, holds mom finally newborn

Tommy Scott was not worried when his pregnant wife called to tell him she thought she was on the road with a migraine. But when he came home from work, Tommy found amber, 38 weeks pregnant, laying in their bedroom do not react with one eye open and the other closed, Moaning and vomiting.
"Rush of course everything through your head," Tommy told today's Natalie Morales. "I phoned 911 right away and the ambulance was there within 10 minutes and we were at the hospital right away. But it was crazy. "
Doctors determined that the 29-year-old Amber had a ruptured blood vessel in his brain — a condition that occurs in approximately six out of every 100,000 pregnancies.
Surgeons elected to deliver her baby by C-section, and then to operate on Amber's brain.
Initially, everything seemed fine as Amber started to come out of the anesthesia. But then things took a frightening turn and she was once again responding. Realizing that the Ambers brain had started to swell rapidly, doctors removed part of her skull to protect her brain from being crushed against the bone.
A month later, Amber woke up, but was not well enough to talk himself. All the while watching her family visited regularly, showing Amber photos of baby, Adeline, she had yet to hold or even.
"We wanted to let her know the baby was okay," Tommy told today. "Since day one we have shows her images."She started to smile a little. She always smiles now. "
On Sunday, for the first time got Amber to keep her baby and begin to care for her.
"She kept the bottle and fed her," Tommy told today. "She needs a little assistance, but the most important part, she grabbed the bottle and went right into the mouth. She knows what is going on. For the first time, smiled Adeline also. "
Amber is still got a long way to go. Doctors predict she will be in intensive rehab for weeks working to regain speech and motor skills.
But they say are positive signs.
"She now communicates with us," said Dr. Andrea Toomer, a doctor at West Jefferson Medical Center, just outside New Orleans, today. "She can tell us what she needs and what she wants, what Bothers her. She is able to ask questions about what is going on. "
It is enough for a start to Amber's mom.
"The fact that she witness Adeline now that she recognizes her, that makes me feel better," said Laura Rabalais today.
For Tommy, who had been looking forward to the day when he and his wife would be parents, it has been "bittersweet."
"Of course you satisfied," he told Morales. "I am happy that I am a father now. But of course I will be with yellow all the time, too.
"Amber was so excited for the last nine months. Her whole life, everything revolved around making sure everything was prepared for Adeline. It is so sad. But we try to include Amber in everything we can. We always tell her daily activities. We do our best to keep her informed. "
Tommy takes hope from the speed of Ambers progress so far.
"I never would have thought that we would be this much sooner, compared to where we were we first started," he told today. "She has motivation to get better, and I believe she will definitively".

Climber dies after 1,000-foot fall on Mount Hood

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
OREGON CITY, Ore. (AP) — A man climbing alone who died early Thursday after falling about 1,000 feet on the south side of Mount Hood was an experienced mountaineer from Portland, a Clackamas County sheriff's officer said.

Mark Cartier, 56, fell from close to the 10,000-foot level, landing on the west side of an area known as the Hogsback near Crater Rock, Sgt. Adam Phillips said.

Cartier "was described as an extremely experienced mountaineer and rock climber," Phillips said.

He had been on a standard climbing route. Other climbers who saw him fall alerted authorities.

In a statement, Cartier's wife, Deb Weekley, said her husband was a past member of Timberline Mountain Guides who "always exemplified the description of preparedness and calculated risk" and used Mount Hood "as his special playground."

"He climbed the mountain as he has done hundreds of times before," she said. "The only thing different this time was that he didn't call me saying he had made it down."

Cartier had climbed mountains in Oregon, California, Alaska, Europe and the Himalayas, his wife said.

Rescuers brought his body down off the mountain later in the day.

Cartier was one of 15 climbers who had registered at Timberline Lodge to solo climb overnight, The Oregonian reported.

Portland Mountain Rescue recommends that climbers tackle Mount Hood in groups of three or more so there are at least two people to help if someone falls.

Cartier was a close friend of many members in that rescue group, said Rocky Henderson, who was with those who helped retrieve the body.

"He had just returned from a climb in Alaska," Henderson told the newspaper. "He had done a lot of different climbs. An accident happened."

Although inexperienced climbers are advised not to climb solo, Henderson said Cartier had the skills and conditioning to do it.

"It's a personal choice," Henderson said. "Solo climbing is dangerous, but the attraction is that I'm responsible for my life and I make that conscious choice. It takes more effort."

Mount Hood, a Cascade Mountains peak that rises more than 11,000 feet about 50 miles east of Portland, is popular among climbers nationwide, but it has been the site of dozens of climbing accidents and fatalities over the past three decades. About 100 climbers were on the peak Thursday, taking advantage of a clear day.

Cartier is the fourth person — and second climber — to die on the mountain this year. The other two fatalities involved snowboarders.

Zac Snow, a 27-year-old climber from Ashland who passed the area where the man fell, told The Oregonian that "up where he was, it gets pretty steep."

Shaken by the climber's fall, he turned around and descended: "It kind of makes you adjust not why you go to the top but why you want to get to the top that day."

View the original article here

Maine man arrested two years after road rage incident

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

A man that lost his arm and 30 spent days in jail after a road rage incident is in trouble with the law again.
According to the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office in Standish, Maine, Douglas Tenczar was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol on Wednesday. His blood-alcohol level was .22 and because he was in possession of alcohol, he violated the terms of his probation set in 2008, when a road rage incident involving three teenage girls occurred.

In 2008, the Portland Press Herald reports Tenczar was arrested and shot by police after he threatened three girls with a handgun and aimed a shotgun at officers when they went to investigate the incident. Police shot him five times at the time, and due to the severity of his injuries, it had to be amputated.

With road rage being among the most common causes of car accidents, anger behind the wheel can affect your car insurance rates. One accident can lead to an insurance claim, and that one claim can send premium rates skyward.

View the original article here

Kansas farmers regroup after twister

Click Here!

AppId is over the quota AppId is over the quota Samuel Rudman, representing aggrieved shareholders, brought a case against Facebook and its underwriters claiming securities laws were violated.